WMKGX vs. WMKSX
WMKGX (WesMark Large Company Fund) and WMKSX (WesMark Small Company Fund) are both mutual funds - WMKGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by WesMark, while WMKSX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by WesMark. Over the past 10 years, WMKGX returned 14.13%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for WMKSX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WMKGX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for WMKSX.
Performance
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMKGX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WMKGX having a 14.13% annualized return and WMKSX not far behind at 13.90%.
WMKGX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 32.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
WMKSX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKGX WesMark Large Company Fund | 12.42% | 16.60% | 21.35% | 21.94% | -21.71% | 25.97% | 26.40% | 26.58% | -6.36% | 24.23% |
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund | 20.68% | 16.19% | 22.12% | 19.42% | -20.72% | 22.81% | 36.78% | 20.32% | -13.92% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMKGX and WMKSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 1997 | 0.79 |
The correlation between WMKGX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMKGX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank
WMKGX
WMKSX
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMKGX | WMKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 4.33 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 14.51 | -2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMKGX drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMKGX and WMKSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMKGX | WMKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.55% | -64.09% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -8.50% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.35% | -24.20% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.06% | -39.84% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | -39.84% | +5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | 0.00% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -15.66% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.53% | +0.09% |
Volatility
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison
WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.89%. This indicates that WMKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMKGX | WMKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.89% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 12.38% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 17.90% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 26.13% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 23.98% | -4.69% |
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMKGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison
WMKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, which matches WMKSX's 18.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKGX WesMark Large Company Fund | 18.81% | 21.23% | 14.72% | 7.64% | 12.78% | 7.52% | 7.53% | 6.49% | 11.44% | 7.92% | 4.76% | 3.64% |
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund | 18.98% | 22.91% | 4.69% | 5.93% | 6.23% | 25.75% | 8.21% | 0.00% | 12.53% | 8.59% | 5.26% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMKGX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMKGX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to WMKSX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMKGX dropped -49.55% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.
WMKGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMKGX and WMKSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer