PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMKGX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMKGX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WMKGX having a 14.13% annualized return and WMKSX not far behind at 13.90%.


WMKGX

1D
1.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
12.42%
6M
11.91%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
14.13%

WMKSX

1D
1.67%
1M
5.13%
YTD
20.68%
6M
18.10%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
24.61%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMKGX
WesMark Large Company Fund
12.42%16.60%21.35%21.94%-21.71%25.97%26.40%26.58%-6.36%24.23%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
20.68%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%20.32%-13.92%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WMKGX and WMKSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 1997

0.79

The correlation between WMKGX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMKGX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMKGX
WMKGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMKGXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

4.33

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

14.51

-2.09

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMKGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMKGX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMKGX drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMKGX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMKGXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.55%

-64.09%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.50%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.35%

-24.20%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.06%

-39.84%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

-39.84%

+5.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

0.00%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-15.66%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.53%

+0.09%

Volatility

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.89%. This indicates that WMKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMKGXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

4.89%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

12.38%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

17.90%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

26.13%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

23.98%

-4.69%

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMKGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMKGX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

WMKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, which matches WMKSX's 18.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WMKGX
WesMark Large Company Fund
18.81%21.23%14.72%7.64%12.78%7.52%7.53%6.49%11.44%7.92%4.76%3.64%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
18.98%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMKGX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMKGX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to WMKSX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMKGX dropped -49.55% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMKGX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer