WMKGX vs. WMBLX
Compare and contrast key facts about WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) and WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX).
WMKGX is managed by WesMark. It was launched on Apr 14, 1997. WMBLX is managed by WesMark. It was launched on Apr 19, 1998.
Performance
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKGX WesMark Large Company Fund | -9.29% | 16.60% | 21.35% | 21.94% | -21.71% | 25.97% | 26.40% | 26.58% | -6.36% | 24.23% |
WMBLX WesMark Balanced Fund | -0.46% | 10.81% | 9.28% | 4.97% | -7.22% | 15.85% | 2.82% | 20.32% | -4.61% | 10.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMKGX achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than WMBLX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, WMKGX has outperformed WMBLX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while WMBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.62% annualized return.
WMKGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
WMBLX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMKGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WMBLX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMKGX vs. WMBLX — Risk / Return Rank
WMKGX
WMBLX
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) and WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMKGX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.11 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.59 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 5.60 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMKGX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.11 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.62 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMKGX and WMBLX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Dividend Comparison
WMKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.37%, more than WMBLX's 7.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKGX WesMark Large Company Fund | 23.37% | 21.23% | 14.72% | 7.64% | 12.78% | 7.52% | 7.53% | 6.49% | 11.44% | 7.92% | 4.76% | 3.64% |
WMBLX WesMark Balanced Fund | 7.65% | 7.70% | 9.82% | 4.70% | 3.78% | 6.03% | 1.63% | 6.20% | 5.83% | 4.32% | 3.80% | 6.73% |
Drawdowns
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMKGX drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, which is greater than WMBLX's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMKGX and WMBLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMKGX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.55% | -35.88% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -8.60% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.06% | -17.77% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | -23.30% | -11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -4.90% | -6.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -6.41% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.89% | +1.21% |
Volatility
WMKGX vs. WMBLX - Volatility Comparison
WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) at 2.32%. This indicates that WMKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMKGX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 2.32% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 5.03% | +5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 10.31% | +9.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 10.19% | +8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 10.79% | +8.39% |