WMK vs. CTRA
WMK (Weis Markets, Inc.) and CTRA (Coterra Energy Inc.) are both stocks. WMK operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while CTRA operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, WMK returned 5.99%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for CTRA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMK vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMK achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than CTRA's 24.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WMK has underperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 5.99%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.42% annualized return.
WMK
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 0.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
CTRA
- 1D
- -8.62%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 6M
- 20.76%
- 1Y
- 31.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
WMK vs. CTRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMK Weis Markets, Inc. | 16.32% | -3.57% | 8.00% | -20.81% | 27.10% | 40.93% | 21.27% | -12.73% | 18.61% | -36.57% |
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 24.61% | 6.68% | 3.38% | 8.72% | 39.15% | 23.50% | -4.33% | -20.78% | -21.07% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMK and CTRA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 1990 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
WMK:
$1.83B
CTRA:
$24.84B
WMK:
$3.98
CTRA:
$2.19
WMK:
18.55
CTRA:
14.88
WMK:
0.37
CTRA:
3.83
WMK:
1.33
CTRA:
1.65
WMK:
$5.01B
CTRA:
$6.48B
WMK:
$1.16B
CTRA:
$2.63B
WMK:
$210.17M
CTRA:
$4.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMK vs. CTRA — Risk / Return Rank
WMK
CTRA
WMK vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMK | CTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.27 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 3.04 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 6.37 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMK | CTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 1.61 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.56 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.18 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
WMK vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMK drawdown since its inception was -48.66%, smaller than the maximum CTRA drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMK and CTRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMK | CTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.66% | -74.41% | +25.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.22% | -15.51% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.37% | -23.62% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -33.25% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.66% | -52.56% | +3.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.10% | -10.33% | -5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.07% | -26.96% | +10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.71% | 7.38% | +3.33% |
Volatility
WMK vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) is 6.50%, while Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that WMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMK | CTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 13.41% | -6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 23.40% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.86% | 30.69% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 34.49% | -6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.73% | 35.56% | -5.83% |
Dividends
WMK vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison
WMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than CTRA's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 2.03% | 3.34% | 3.29% | 4.58% | 8.47% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 1.12% | 0.59% | 0.34% | 0.45% |
WMK Weis Markets, Inc. | 1.84% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.13% | 1.58% | 1.90% | 2.59% | 3.06% | 2.53% | 2.90% | 1.80% | 2.71% |
Financials
WMK vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weis Markets, Inc. and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WMK vs. CTRA - Profitability Comparison
WMK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weis Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 330.25M and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.
CTRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 876.00M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.
WMK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weis Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.70M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
CTRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 646.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.5%.
WMK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weis Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 27.85M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
CTRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a net income of 466.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 40.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMK and CTRA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTRA has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to WMK (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMK dropped -48.66% vs CTRA's -74.41%.
CTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMK and CTRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer