PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMIN.DE achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than G2X.DE's -14.60% return.


WMIN.DE

1D
-0.81%
1M
-12.51%
6M
-10.19%
YTD
1.03%
1Y
56.11%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*

G2X.DE

1D
-2.36%
1M
-13.21%
6M
-23.54%
YTD
-14.60%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WMIN.DE
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
1.03%71.98%-2.56%0.55%10.07%17.35%19.27%27.28%-25.60%
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-14.60%131.10%17.58%5.59%-0.03%-4.26%13.26%40.99%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WMIN.DE and G2X.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.68

Over the past year, WMIN.DE and G2X.DE have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMIN.DE
WMIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WMIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

G2X.DE
G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMIN.DEG2X.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.37

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

3.20

+2.71

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMIN.DE and G2X.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum G2X.DE drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMIN.DE and G2X.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMIN.DEG2X.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-46.04%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.37%

-34.86%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.37%

-34.86%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-38.53%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.76%

-33.85%

+12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-20.03%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

14.95%

-5.69%

Volatility

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) is 10.76%, while VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a volatility of 14.21%. This indicates that WMIN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2X.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMIN.DEG2X.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

14.21%

-3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

36.61%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.38%

45.42%

-10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.40%

33.93%

-6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.38%

32.51%

-4.13%

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMIN.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than G2X.DE's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMIN.DE vs. G2X.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMIN.DE nor G2X.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, WMIN.DE and G2X.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WMIN.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WMIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for G2X.DE.

WMIN.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while G2X.DE is Gold. WMIN.DE tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WMIN.DE and 0.53% for G2X.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMIN.DE and G2X.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer