PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMICX vs. WAMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMICX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than WAMCX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WMICX has outperformed WAMCX with an annualized return of 14.39%, while WAMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.


WMICX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.67%
YTD
13.73%
6M
13.59%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
14.39%

WAMCX

1D
0.06%
1M
5.08%
YTD
7.13%
6M
4.32%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
-3.87%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMICX
Wasatch Micro Cap Fund
13.73%4.84%20.91%22.58%-40.64%4.51%64.84%42.31%1.73%36.17%
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
7.13%-2.85%8.25%19.19%-39.71%5.23%71.48%38.09%10.34%31.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WMICX and WAMCX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 1995

0.89

The correlation between WMICX and WAMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMICX vs. WAMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMICX
WMICX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

WAMCX
WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMICXWAMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.14

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

3.76

+3.87

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the WAMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMICX and WAMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMICXWAMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.91

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.14

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.48

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.39

+0.27

Drawdowns

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMICX drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, roughly equal to the maximum WAMCX drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMICX and WAMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMICXWAMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-66.51%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.32%

-16.89%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.44%

-33.21%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.70%

-53.18%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.96%

-53.18%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-28.01%

+17.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-15.15%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

5.13%

-1.00%

Volatility

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) at 4.94%. This indicates that WMICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMICXWAMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.94%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

15.89%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

21.33%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

27.39%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

25.62%

-1.25%

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMICX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMCX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMICX vs. WAMCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMICX nor WAMCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.08%2.99%1.96%7.65%11.92%11.44%9.18%
WMICX
Wasatch Micro Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%30.82%5.68%11.40%29.75%15.30%9.30%16.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMICX and WAMCX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMICX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to WAMCX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMICX dropped -65.21% vs WAMCX's -66.51%.

WMICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMICX and WAMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer