WMBLX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
WMBLX is managed by WesMark. It was launched on Apr 19, 1998. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBLX WesMark Balanced Fund | -0.46% | 10.81% | 9.28% | 4.97% | -7.22% | 15.85% | 2.82% | 20.32% | -4.61% | 10.77% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 9.23% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMBLX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 9.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WMBLX having a 6.62% annualized return and PUDZX not far ahead at 6.92%.
WMBLX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.62%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMBLX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMBLX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
WMBLX
PUDZX
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.98 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 2.57 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 2.35 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 13.15 | -7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.98 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.88 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.72 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMBLX and PUDZX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
WMBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, less than PUDZX's 8.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBLX WesMark Balanced Fund | 7.65% | 7.70% | 9.82% | 4.70% | 3.78% | 6.03% | 1.63% | 6.20% | 5.83% | 4.32% | 3.80% | 6.73% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.17% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMBLX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBLX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.88% | -21.53% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.60% | -8.20% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.77% | -17.98% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.30% | -21.53% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -2.44% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -5.31% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.47% | +0.42% |
Volatility
WMBLX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) is 2.32%, while PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that WMBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 2.60% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 6.24% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 9.70% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 10.58% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 9.70% | +1.09% |