PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMBFX vs. FIQDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMBFX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than FIQDX's 6.68% return.


WMBFX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.10%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.21%
1Y
16.63%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
5.77%

FIQDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
6.68%
6M
6.44%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WMBFX
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
7.59%11.39%6.59%9.45%-15.07%7.64%14.95%13.72%-6.41%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
6.68%10.40%6.03%4.55%-3.17%15.96%3.79%10.63%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WMBFX and FIQDX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.66

The correlation between WMBFX and FIQDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMBFX vs. FIQDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMBFX
WMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQDX
FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMBFXFIQDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

4.72

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

18.89

-6.72

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FIQDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMBFX and FIQDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, roughly equal to the maximum FIQDX drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBFX and FIQDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMBFXFIQDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-19.98%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-2.69%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-5.91%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-12.79%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-2.69%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-2.97%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

0.67%

+0.73%

Volatility

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) at 1.40%. This indicates that WMBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMBFXFIQDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

1.40%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

3.72%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

4.81%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

6.91%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.25%

7.40%

-0.15%

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMBFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMBFX vs. FIQDX - Dividend Comparison

WMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than FIQDX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
4.27%4.75%4.88%5.38%7.39%5.44%2.29%3.17%8.46%0.00%
WMBFX
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
2.04%2.20%1.97%2.60%5.57%9.26%9.32%2.29%8.93%9.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMBFX and FIQDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMBFX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to FIQDX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBFX dropped -19.15% vs FIQDX's -19.98%.

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMBFX and FIQDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer