PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMBFX vs. ESPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMBFX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than ESPAX's 13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBFX has underperformed ESPAX with an annualized return of 5.77%, while ESPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.


WMBFX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.10%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.21%
1Y
16.63%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
5.77%

ESPAX

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.68%
YTD
13.28%
6M
11.40%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMBFX
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
7.59%11.39%6.59%9.45%-15.07%7.64%14.95%13.72%-5.67%10.27%
ESPAX
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund
13.28%-3.10%6.44%18.65%-13.94%27.61%1.16%28.03%-13.77%11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between WMBFX and ESPAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.72

The correlation between WMBFX and ESPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMBFX vs. ESPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMBFX
WMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPAX
ESPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ESPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMBFXESPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

1.57

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

4.60

+7.57

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ESPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMBFX and ESPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, smaller than the maximum ESPAX drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBFX and ESPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMBFXESPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-61.14%

+41.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-13.58%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-24.80%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-26.84%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.15%

-43.28%

+24.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.05%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-9.13%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

4.62%

-3.22%

Volatility

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) is 3.44%, while Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that WMBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMBFXESPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

4.62%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

12.36%

-6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

17.88%

-9.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

20.20%

-12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.25%

21.42%

-14.17%

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMBFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMBFX vs. ESPAX - Dividend Comparison

WMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than ESPAX's 7.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPAX
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund
7.29%8.26%10.10%2.07%6.24%6.34%0.39%1.68%7.90%5.33%2.25%2.33%
WMBFX
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
2.04%2.20%1.97%2.60%5.57%9.26%9.32%2.29%8.93%9.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMBFX and ESPAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESPAX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to WMBFX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBFX dropped -19.15% vs ESPAX's -61.14%.

WMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMBFX and ESPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer