WMB vs. IBTL
WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) is a stock, while IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 3 years, WMB returned 38.58%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for IBTL. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMB vs. IBTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMB achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than IBTL's -0.37% return.
WMB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
IBTL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMB vs. IBTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.67% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 9.21% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.37% | 7.85% | 0.36% | 3.60% | -15.60% | -1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMB and IBTL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMB vs. IBTL — Risk / Return Rank
WMB
IBTL
WMB vs. IBTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMB | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.16 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 3.19 | +1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMB vs. IBTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMB drawdown since its inception was -98.03%, which is greater than IBTL's maximum drawdown of -20.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMB and IBTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMB | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.03% | -20.93% | -77.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -2.83% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -7.38% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -7.16% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -11.43% | -15.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 1.03% | +4.79% |
Volatility
WMB vs. IBTL - Volatility Comparison
The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) at 1.11%. This indicates that WMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMB | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 1.11% | +6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 2.41% | +13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.00% | 3.50% | +19.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 7.44% | +16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 7.44% | +23.51% |
Dividends
WMB vs. IBTL - Dividend Comparison
WMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than IBTL's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.84% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMB and IBTL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMB has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to IBTL (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMB dropped -98.03% vs IBTL's -20.93%.
WMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMB and IBTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer