WLFC vs. FNMAS
WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation) and FNMAS (Federal National Mortgage Association) are both stocks. WLFC operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while FNMAS operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WLFC returned 23.34%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for FNMAS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLFC achieves a 40.80% return, which is significantly higher than FNMAS's -22.19% return. Over the past 10 years, WLFC has outperformed FNMAS with an annualized return of 23.34%, while FNMAS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.
WLFC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 40.80%
- 6M
- 43.65%
- 1Y
- 34.74%
- 3Y*
- 66.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.79%
- 10Y*
- 23.34%
FNMAS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- -22.19%
- 6M
- -19.00%
- 1Y
- -16.61%
- 3Y*
- 94.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 40.80% | -34.14% | 332.92% | -17.17% | 56.73% | 23.60% | -48.29% | 70.26% | 38.57% | -2.38% |
FNMAS Federal National Mortgage Association | -22.19% | 27.66% | 270.50% | 37.61% | -25.00% | -63.64% | -28.20% | 71.94% | -21.02% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLFC and FNMAS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
WLFC:
$1.38B
FNMAS:
$69.83B
WLFC:
$17.02
FNMAS:
$2.77
WLFC:
11.18
FNMAS:
4.28
WLFC:
0.00
FNMAS:
0.00
WLFC:
1.78
FNMAS:
0.43
WLFC:
$757.62M
FNMAS:
$160.91B
WLFC:
$405.87M
FNMAS:
$85.61B
WLFC:
$416.98M
FNMAS:
$143.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLFC vs. FNMAS — Risk / Return Rank
WLFC
FNMAS
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLFC | FNMAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.95 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.45 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | -0.88 | +2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLFC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, roughly equal to the maximum FNMAS drawdown of -89.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLFC and FNMAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLFC | FNMAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -89.36% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.84% | -38.53% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.88% | -38.53% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -78.07% | +28.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.76% | -89.36% | +9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.21% | -32.56% | +12.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.35% | -42.63% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.87% | 19.59% | -3.72% |
Volatility
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Volatility Comparison
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS) at 10.03%. This indicates that WLFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLFC | FNMAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 10.03% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.76% | 32.80% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.92% | 39.83% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.82% | 66.77% | -23.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.96% | 61.22% | -10.26% |
Dividends
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Dividend Comparison
WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while FNMAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FNMAS Federal National Mortgage Association | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.72% |
Financials
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WLFC vs. FNMAS - Profitability Comparison
WLFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FNMAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WLFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 33.79M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
FNMAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
WLFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a net income of 23.66M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
FNMAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WLFC and FNMAS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLFC has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to FNMAS (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLFC dropped -88.12% vs FNMAS's -89.36%.
WLFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLFC and FNMAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer