WLDS vs. OSS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) and One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS).

Performance

WLDS vs. OSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) and One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WLDS vs. OSS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WLDS Wearable Devices Ltd.	-57.89%	-86.93%	-68.31%	-21.18%	-84.69%
OSS One Stop Systems, Inc.	5.43%	114.33%	59.52%	-30.23%	-14.97%

Fundamentals

EPS WLDS : -$91.64 OSS : -$0.31
PS Ratio WLDS : 0.21 OSS : 2.80
Total Revenue (TTM) WLDS : $1.17M OSS : $60.26M
Gross Profit (TTM) WLDS : -$126.00K OSS : $17.48M
EBITDA (TTM) WLDS : -$15.96M OSS : -$4.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDS achieves a -57.89% return, which is significantly lower than OSS's 5.43% return.

WLDS

• 1D: 20.00%
• 1M: -37.00%
• YTD: -57.89%
• 6M: -90.14%
• 1Y: -74.33%
• 3Y*: -77.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OSS

• 1D: 4.99%
• 1M: -8.30%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 6M: 41.23%
• 1Y: 226.29%
• 3Y*: 45.06%
• 5Y*: 2.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WLDS vs. OSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDS

WLDS Risk / Return Rank: 44
WLDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WLDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WLDS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
WLDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
WLDS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

OSS

OSS Risk / Return Rank: 92
OSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
OSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
OSS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
OSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
OSS Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDS vs. OSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) and One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLDS	OSS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	2.27	-2.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	3.02	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	5.59	-6.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	13.58	-14.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDS vs. OSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the OSS Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDS and OSS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLDS	OSS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	2.27	-2.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	0.07	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between WLDS and OSS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WLDS vs. OSS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WLDS nor OSS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WLDS vs. OSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDS drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than OSS's maximum drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS and OSS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDS	OSS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.83%	-83.61%	-16.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.75%	-38.32%	-57.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.80%	-35.24%	-64.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.79%	-55.42%	-30.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.60%	15.77%	+49.83%

Volatility

WLDS vs. OSS - Volatility Comparison

Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) has a higher volatility of 29.58% compared to One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) at 27.23%. This indicates that WLDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLDS	OSS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.58%	27.23%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.90%	76.97%	-4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	431.68%	100.47%	+331.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	281.68%	77.39%	+204.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	281.68%	81.48%	+200.20%

Financials