PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSS vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OSS vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSS achieves a 137.05% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 5.37% return.


OSS

1D
-6.43%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
137.05%
6M
129.69%
1Y
333.08%
3Y*
81.01%
5Y*
22.78%
10Y*

LMT

1D
2.04%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
5.37%
6M
5.61%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSS vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OSS
One Stop Systems, Inc.
137.05%114.33%59.52%-30.23%-39.19%23.75%98.02%4.12%-65.05%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
5.37%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-24.31%

Correlation

The correlation between OSS and LMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OSS:

$420.07M

LMT:

$116.40B

EPS

OSS:

$0.29

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

OSS:

59.71

LMT:

24.43

PS Ratio

OSS:

19.70

LMT:

1.56

PB Ratio

OSS:

9.27

LMT:

15.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

OSS:

$19.96M

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OSS:

$15.16M

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

OSS:

-$2.46M

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSS vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSS
OSS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
OSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
OSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSS vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSSLMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.09

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.76

0.36

+8.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.65

0.86

+18.79

OSS vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSS Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSS and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSS vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSS drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSS and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSSLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.61%

-79.29%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.32%

-26.58%

-11.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.04%

-31.79%

-24.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.08%

-31.79%

-43.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.69%

-25.08%

+10.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.36%

-26.83%

-27.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.05%

11.05%

+6.00%

Volatility

OSS vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) has a higher volatility of 20.99% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 9.07%. This indicates that OSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSSLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.99%

9.07%

+11.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.33%

20.81%

+62.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.73%

26.50%

+85.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.09%

23.14%

+57.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.71%

23.85%

+59.86%

Dividends

OSS vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

OSS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.71%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
OSS
One Stop Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OSS vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between One Stop Systems, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B202220232024202520260
18.02B
(OSS) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OSS and LMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSS has higher volatility (20.99%) compared to LMT (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSS dropped -83.61% vs LMT's -79.29%.

OSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSS and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer