WLDS vs. SPYG
WLDS (Wearable Devices Ltd.) is a stock, while SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Over the past 3 years, WLDS returned -86.36%/yr vs 24.04%/yr for SPYG. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WLDS vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDS achieves a -75.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 10.06% return.
WLDS
- 1D
- -18.99%
- 1M
- 48.84%
- 6M
- -69.62%
- YTD
- -75.05%
- 1Y
- -80.78%
- 3Y*
- -86.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -84.32%
SPYG
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $321.11M | $273.47M | $308.09M | |
| $23.68M | $11.32M | $4.38M |
WLDS vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS Wearable Devices Ltd. | -75.05% | -86.93% | -68.31% | -21.18% | -90.71% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 10.06% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDS and SPYG is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDS vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
WLDS
SPYG
WLDS vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLDS | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 1.42 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 5.17 | -6.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLDS vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDS | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -67.63% | -32.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.43% | -13.76% | -84.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.88% | -22.14% | -77.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -4.33% | -95.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.79% | -24.20% | -67.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.17% | 3.78% | +78.39% |
Volatility
WLDS vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) has a higher volatility of 77.30% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.08%. This indicates that WLDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDS | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 77.30% | 6.08% | +71.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.91% | 14.85% | +88.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 436.46% | 18.18% | +418.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 275.21% | 21.50% | +253.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 275.21% | 20.79% | +254.42% |
Dividends
WLDS vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
WLDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
WLDS Wearable Devices Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDS and SPYG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLDS has higher volatility (77.30%) compared to SPYG (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDS dropped -99.96% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLDS and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer