PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDS.L vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while AGG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.92% return.


WLDS.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
1.87%
YTD
13.19%
6M
13.02%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.13%
1M
1.49%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.04%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
1.36%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WLDS.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
13.19%11.75%8.63%11.26%-8.89%16.71%12.54%20.41%-31.05%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.92%-0.44%3.08%0.37%-2.68%-0.84%4.32%4.33%13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDS.L and AGG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.06

The correlation between WLDS.L and AGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (5 years) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDS.L vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDS.L
WLDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDS.LAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.19

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

1.18

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

3.12

+12.16

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDS.L and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDS.LAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.01

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.14

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.51

-0.28

Drawdowns

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDS.LAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-17.60%

-25.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-5.31%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.53%

-8.64%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-14.70%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-9.53%

+8.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-7.11%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.01%

+0.08%

Volatility

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.40%. This indicates that WLDS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDS.LAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

1.40%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

4.74%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

6.22%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

8.61%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.47%

9.82%

+12.65%

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLDS.L vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

WLDS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
WLDS.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDS.L and AGG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WLDS.L.

WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AGG is Total Bond Market. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WLDS.L and 0.03% for AGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer