WLDR vs. LVHI
WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDR is a Global Equities fund tracking the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDR returned 18.46%/yr vs 16.14%/yr for LVHI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDR charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
WLDR vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 29.78% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 14.47% return.
WLDR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 25.70%
- YTD
- 29.78%
- 1Y
- 50.96%
- 3Y*
- 30.20%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 31.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- —
WLDR vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 29.78% | 31.24% | 22.74% | 18.93% | -10.44% | 26.77% | -1.93% | 21.54% | -18.38% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 14.47% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDR and LVHI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between WLDR and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WLDR vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WLDR
LVHI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
WLDR
LVHI
Financial Services
WLDR
LVHI
Communication Services
WLDR
LVHI
Industrials
WLDR
LVHI
Healthcare
WLDR
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
WLDR
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
WLDR
LVHI
Energy
WLDR
LVHI
Basic Materials
WLDR
LVHI
Utilities
WLDR
LVHI
Real Estate
WLDR
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDR vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
WLDR
LVHI
WLDR vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLDR | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.61 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | 5.07 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.25 | 20.84 | +0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLDR vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDR | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.69% | -32.31% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -6.08% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.30% | -11.99% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -11.99% | -11.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | 0.00% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -3.49% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.48% | +0.88% |
Volatility
WLDR vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.75%. This indicates that WLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDR | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 2.75% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 7.75% | +6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 9.62% | +7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 11.07% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 13.72% | +7.31% |
WLDR vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLDR vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than LVHI's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.66% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 7.17% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDR and LVHI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLDR has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to LVHI (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.46% vs 16.14% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 16.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.
WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 4.66% for LVHI.
WLDR is categorized as Global Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLDR and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer