WLDR vs. AVTM
WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) and AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WLDR is passively managed, while AVTM is actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDR charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for AVTM.
Performance
WLDR vs. AVTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WLDR
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 29.55%
- 6M
- 34.62%
- 1Y
- 57.12%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLDR vs. AVTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 20.77% |
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDR and AVTM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.80 |
WLDR vs. AVTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WLDR
AVTM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
WLDR
AVTM
Financial Services
WLDR
AVTM
Communication Services
WLDR
AVTM
Consumer Defensive
WLDR
AVTM
Healthcare
WLDR
AVTM
Industrials
WLDR
AVTM
Consumer Cyclical
WLDR
AVTM
Energy
WLDR
AVTM
Basic Materials
WLDR
AVTM
Utilities
WLDR
AVTM
Real Estate
WLDR
AVTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDR vs. AVTM — Risk / Return Rank
WLDR
AVTM
WLDR vs. AVTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLDR | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLDR | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.88 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
WLDR vs. AVTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than AVTM's maximum drawdown of -9.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and AVTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDR | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.69% | -9.21% | -35.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.65% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -2.08% | -6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility
WLDR vs. AVTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDR | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 15.88% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 15.88% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 15.88% | +5.06% |
WLDR vs. AVTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than AVTM's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLDR vs. AVTM - Dividend Comparison
WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than AVTM's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 7.05% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDR and AVTM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.
WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.22% for AVTM.
Find the right allocation for WLDR and AVTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer