PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDN vs. MAZE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WLDN vs. MAZE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDN achieves a -7.10% return, which is significantly higher than MAZE's -41.95% return.


WLDN

1D
-1.21%
1M
5.06%
YTD
-7.10%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
72.52%
3Y*
71.89%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
24.56%

MAZE

1D
-0.17%
1M
-9.00%
YTD
-41.95%
6M
-38.11%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDN vs. MAZE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WLDN
Willdan Group, Inc.
-7.10%184.78%
MAZE
Maze Therapeutics, Inc
-41.95%157.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDN and MAZE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WLDN:

$1.48B

MAZE:

$1.30B

EPS

WLDN:

$3.71

MAZE:

-$2.63

PB Ratio

WLDN:

4.78

MAZE:

3.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

WLDN:

$684.28M

MAZE:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

WLDN:

$261.18M

MAZE:

-$1.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

WLDN:

$64.86M

MAZE:

-$126.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDN vs. MAZE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDN
WLDN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WLDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MAZE
MAZE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MAZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAZE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MAZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAZE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDN vs. MAZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLDNMAZEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

3.16

-0.17

WLDN vs. MAZE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the MAZE Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDN and MAZE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLDN vs. MAZE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDN drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than MAZE's maximum drawdown of -54.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDN and MAZE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDNMAZEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.19%

-54.51%

-34.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.41%

-54.51%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.63%

-53.60%

+24.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.35%

-20.99%

-21.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.78%

24.60%

-0.82%

Volatility

WLDN vs. MAZE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) is 8.81%, while Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) has a volatility of 11.72%. This indicates that WLDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDNMAZEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

11.72%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.77%

56.26%

-5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.10%

89.54%

-24.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.91%

94.20%

-38.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.13%

94.20%

-40.07%

Dividends

WLDN vs. MAZE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WLDN nor MAZE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WLDN vs. MAZE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willdan Group, Inc. and Maze Therapeutics, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
155.11M
0
(WLDN) Total Revenue
(MAZE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDN and MAZE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAZE has higher volatility (11.72%) compared to WLDN (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDN dropped -89.19% vs MAZE's -54.51%.

WLDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDN and MAZE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer