PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WKL.AS (Wolters Kluwer N.V.) is a stock, while CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, WKL.AS returned 8.09%/yr vs 21.25%/yr for CNDX.AS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Wolters Kluwer N.V. (WKL.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WKL.AS achieves a -25.36% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.AS's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WKL.AS has underperformed CNDX.AS with an annualized return of 8.09%, while CNDX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.25% annualized return.

WKL.AS

1D
6.64%
1M
3.97%
YTD
-25.36%
6M
-26.96%
1Y
-57.39%
3Y*
-15.23%
5Y*
-2.24%
10Y*
8.09%

CNDX.AS

1D
-0.77%
1M
8.03%
YTD
20.95%
6M
18.73%
1Y
37.03%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WKL.AS
Wolters Kluwer N.V.		-25.36%-43.94%26.48%33.94%-4.04%52.60%8.21%27.93%21.33%29.00%
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		20.95%6.16%35.29%50.41%-29.90%38.80%35.83%40.51%4.53%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WKL.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between WKL.AS and CNDX.AS has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Wolters Kluwer N.V.

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with WKL.AS:
WKL.AS vs. HEIA.ASWKL.AS vs. WOSB.DEWKL.AS vs. WTKWYWKL.AS vs. VOOWKL.AS vs. URTHWKL.AS vs. SCHDWKL.AS vs. ^GSPC
Often compared with CNDX.AS:
CNDX.AS vs. QQQMCNDX.AS vs. CNDX.LCNDX.AS vs. CSNDX.MICNDX.AS vs. CSPX.ASCNDX.AS vs. ANXU.LCNDX.AS vs. IWDA.ASCNDX.AS vs. NQSE.DE

Return for Risk

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WKL.AS
WKL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
WKL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WKL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
WKL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
WKL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WKL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS
CNDX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wolters Kluwer N.V. (WKL.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WKL.ASCNDX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.61
2.41

-4.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-2.75
3.20

-5.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.67

1.43

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

3.70

-4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

11.01

-12.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WKL.AS Sharpe Ratio is -1.61, which is lower than the CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WKL.AS and CNDX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WKL.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.61

2.41

-4.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.93

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

1.07

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.03

-0.66

Drawdowns

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WKL.AS drawdown since its inception was -80.22%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WKL.AS and CNDX.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WKL.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.22%

-31.21%

-49.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.96%

-10.06%

-52.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.85%

-26.57%

-41.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.85%

-31.21%

-36.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.85%

-31.21%

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.87%

-0.77%

-62.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.28%

-5.45%

-20.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.75%

3.41%

+38.34%

Volatility

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison

Wolters Kluwer N.V. (WKL.AS) has a higher volatility of 15.36% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) at 4.35%. This indicates that WKL.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WKL.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.36%

4.35%

+11.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.58%

10.74%

+18.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.49%

15.45%

+20.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

19.72%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

19.61%

+2.30%

Dividends

WKL.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison

WKL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WKL.AS
Wolters Kluwer N.V.		3.92%2.75%1.37%1.48%1.70%1.38%1.82%1.58%1.92%1.84%2.21%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

WKL.AS and CNDX.AS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WKL.AS and CNDX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer