WK vs. ZETA
WK (Workiva Inc.) and ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, WK returned -20.31%/yr vs 37.46%/yr for ZETA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WK vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WK achieves a -42.21% return, which is significantly lower than ZETA's 14.35% return.
WK
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- -11.91%
- YTD
- -42.21%
- 6M
- -45.87%
- 1Y
- -27.56%
- 3Y*
- -20.31%
- 5Y*
- -11.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
ZETA
- 1D
- -7.84%
- 1M
- 26.06%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 76.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WK vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WK Workiva Inc. | -42.21% | -21.23% | 7.85% | 20.91% | -35.65% | 32.26% |
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | 14.35% | 13.12% | 103.97% | 7.96% | -2.97% | -5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WK and ZETA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
WK:
$0.25
ZETA:
-$0.14
WK:
3.11
ZETA:
2.68
WK:
$925.59M
ZETA:
$1.44B
WK:
$734.96M
ZETA:
$881.70M
WK:
$30.02M
ZETA:
$50.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WK vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank
WK
ZETA
WK vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Workiva Inc. (WK) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WK | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.23 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.91 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 3.91 | -5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WK | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 1.05 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
WK vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WK drawdown since its inception was -72.45%, roughly equal to the maximum ZETA drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WK and ZETA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WK | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.45% | -70.01% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.51% | -40.37% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.40% | -70.01% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.01% | -36.66% | -32.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -34.03% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.20% | 19.66% | +3.54% |
Volatility
WK vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Workiva Inc. (WK) is 19.77%, while Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a volatility of 24.19%. This indicates that WK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WK | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.77% | 24.19% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.37% | 48.30% | -15.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.84% | 73.49% | -21.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.89% | 72.21% | -26.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.52% | 72.21% | -28.69% |
Dividends
WK vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison
Neither WK nor ZETA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
WK vs. ZETA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Workiva Inc. and Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WK vs. ZETA - Profitability Comparison
WK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Workiva Inc. reported a gross profit of 198.76M and revenue of 247.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.4%.
ZETA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 233.86M and revenue of 396.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
WK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Workiva Inc. reported an operating income of 15.32M and revenue of 247.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
ZETA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -18.84M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.
WK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Workiva Inc. reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 247.31M, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
ZETA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -13.25M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WK and ZETA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZETA has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to WK (19.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WK dropped -72.45% vs ZETA's -70.01%.
ZETA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WK and ZETA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer