PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WK vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Workiva Inc. (WK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WK achieves a -42.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, WK has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.64%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


WK

1D
-4.04%
1M
-11.91%
YTD
-42.21%
6M
-45.87%
1Y
-27.56%
3Y*
-20.31%
5Y*
-11.51%
10Y*
13.64%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WK
Workiva Inc.
-42.21%-21.23%7.85%20.91%-35.65%42.43%117.88%17.16%67.71%56.78%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WK and QQQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between WK and QQQ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WK
WK Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
WK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WK Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WK Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Workiva Inc. (WK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WKQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.45

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

3.51

-4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

13.49

-14.68

WK vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WK Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WK and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WKQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

2.64

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.81

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.99

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.41

-0.13

Drawdowns

WK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WK drawdown since its inception was -72.45%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WK and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WKQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.45%

-82.97%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.51%

-11.96%

-40.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.40%

-22.77%

-38.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.45%

-35.12%

-37.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.45%

-35.12%

-37.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.01%

-0.26%

-68.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-32.79%

+6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.20%

3.11%

+20.09%

Volatility

WK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Workiva Inc. (WK) has a higher volatility of 19.77% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that WK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WKQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.77%

4.49%

+15.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.37%

12.10%

+20.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.84%

15.94%

+35.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.89%

22.38%

+23.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.52%

22.29%

+21.23%

Dividends

WK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

WK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
WK
Workiva Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WK and QQQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WK has higher volatility (19.77%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WK dropped -72.45% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WK and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer