WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS
WITS.AS (iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF) and CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WITS.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while CNDX.AS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WITS.AS returned 20.38%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for CNDX.AS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WITS.AS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNDX.AS.
Performance
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WITS.AS is traded in USD, while CNDX.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CNDX.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WITS.AS achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.AS's 19.58% return.
WITS.AS
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 47.95%
- 3Y*
- 31.66%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- —
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 40.15%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 23.70% | 22.39% | 28.01% | 60.19% | -33.27% | 30.12% | 44.49% | 12.11% |
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 19.58% | 20.42% | 26.92% | 55.16% | -34.12% | 29.34% | 47.85% | 9.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WITS.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between WITS.AS and CNDX.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank
WITS.AS
CNDX.AS
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WITS.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.55 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 13.44 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WITS.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.56 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WITS.AS drawdown since its inception was -39.08%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WITS.AS and CNDX.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WITS.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.08% | -35.03% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -11.15% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | -22.88% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.08% | -35.03% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -0.78% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -5.26% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 2.96% | +2.24% |
Volatility
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) at 4.58%. This indicates that WITS.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WITS.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 4.58% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 11.22% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 15.49% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.75% | 20.49% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 19.87% | +4.74% |
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WITS.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
WITS.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison
WITS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, WITS.AS and CNDX.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WITS.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WITS.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
WITS.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while CNDX.AS is Nasdaq-100. WITS.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WITS.AS and 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
Find the right allocation for WITS.AS and CNDX.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer