WIP vs. RBIL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL).
WIP and RBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WIP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD). It was launched on Mar 13, 2008. RBIL is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2025. Both WIP and RBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WIP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WIP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 1.01% | 10.92% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 1.65% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WIP achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 1.65% return.
WIP
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WIP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WIP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
WIP
RBIL
WIP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 3.76 | -2.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 6.07 | -4.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 2.00 | -0.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 7.98 | -5.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 35.17 | -28.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 3.76 | -2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 4.10 | -3.99 |
Correlation
The correlation between WIP and RBIL is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WIP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
WIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than RBIL's 4.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 5.41% | 5.51% | 6.06% | 6.54% | 11.15% | 4.63% | 1.59% | 2.49% | 4.05% | 1.91% | 1.27% | 1.14% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.42% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WIP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIP drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIP and RBIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -0.50% | -29.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -0.50% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.90% | -0.08% | -6.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -0.06% | -8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 0.11% | +1.63% |
Volatility
WIP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.58%. This indicates that WIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 0.58% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.01% | 0.67% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 1.04% | +8.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 1.03% | +10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 1.03% | +9.09% |