PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WING.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WING.L achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, WING.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 5.62%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.


WING.L

1D
0.37%
1M
0.04%
6M
0.95%
YTD
0.95%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
5.62%

ISAC.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.60%
6M
9.67%
YTD
11.18%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.95%12.63%2.89%12.92%-14.36%2.26%17.97%15.54%-5.11%12.38%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.18%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.75%-9.73%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between WING.L and ISAC.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2016

0.64

The correlation between WING.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WING.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WING.L
WING.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WING.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.70

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

10.76

-5.70

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WING.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WING.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WING.L drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WING.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WING.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.18%

-33.82%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-8.77%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-16.56%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-26.07%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

-33.82%

+8.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.03%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-4.62%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.20%

-1.09%

Volatility

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) is 1.58%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that WING.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WING.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

3.18%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.86%

10.57%

-6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

12.88%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

15.65%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.09%

15.82%

-6.73%

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WING.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WING.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

WING.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.71%5.67%5.86%5.20%4.43%3.92%4.25%4.56%4.98%4.44%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


WING.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WING.L.

WING.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. WING.L tracks iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WING.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WING.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer