WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WIND.AS (SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF) and RM8U.DE (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - WIND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while RM8U.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WIND.AS returned 12.43%/yr vs 19.43%/yr for RM8U.DE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WIND.AS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RM8U.DE.

Performance

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIND.AS achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than RM8U.DE's 2.09% return.

WIND.AS

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

RM8U.DE

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 5.54%
• 1Y: 29.62%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: 19.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WIND.AS SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF	12.26%	11.18%	20.83%	19.00%	-7.88%	25.94%	12.50%
RM8U.DE HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC	2.09%	48.89%	34.03%	9.20%	6.98%	3.69%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WIND.AS and RM8U.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	0.07

The correlation between WIND.AS and RM8U.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIND.AS

WIND.AS Risk / Return Rank: 41
WIND.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
WIND.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
WIND.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
WIND.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
WIND.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RM8U.DE

RM8U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 35
RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RM8U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RM8U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RM8U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RM8U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WIND.AS	RM8U.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.73	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.78	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	4.56	+3.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIND.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIND.AS and RM8U.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WIND.AS	RM8U.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	1.20	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.00	-0.35

Drawdowns

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIND.AS drawdown since its inception was -38.13%, which is greater than RM8U.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIND.AS and RM8U.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIND.AS	RM8U.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.13%	-18.51%	-19.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-16.54%	+7.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.94%	-16.54%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.94%	-16.54%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-15.51%	+14.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-6.13%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	6.48%	-3.91%

Volatility

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) is 4.69%, while HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that WIND.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RM8U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WIND.AS	RM8U.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	5.48%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	20.07%	-8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	23.03%	-8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.00%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	16.17%	+2.56%

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIND.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RM8U.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIND.AS vs. RM8U.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WIND.AS nor RM8U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIND.AS and RM8U.DE in my portfolio?

WIND.AS and RM8U.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WIND.AS or RM8U.DE?

On fees, RM8U.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WIND.AS or RM8U.DE?

RM8U.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WIND.AS.

What is the main difference between WIND.AS and RM8U.DE?

WIND.AS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RM8U.DE is Precious Metals. WIND.AS tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while RM8U.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: State Street and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WIND.AS and 0.22% for RM8U.DE.