PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIND.AS achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than DIA.AS's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, WIND.AS has underperformed DIA.AS with an annualized return of 12.19%, while DIA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.


WIND.AS

1D
0.50%
1M
2.23%
YTD
12.26%
6M
14.77%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
12.19%

DIA.AS

1D
1.09%
1M
4.34%
YTD
7.19%
6M
7.57%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WIND.AS
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF
12.26%11.18%20.83%19.00%-7.88%25.94%2.18%29.89%-10.56%9.61%
DIA.AS
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
7.19%2.13%22.48%11.53%-1.09%31.76%-0.04%26.82%0.96%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between WIND.AS and DIA.AS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2009

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between WIND.AS and DIA.AS has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIND.AS
WIND.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WIND.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIND.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIND.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WIND.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIND.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA.AS
DIA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DIA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WIND.ASDIA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.12

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.49

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

12.35

-4.66

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIND.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the DIA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIND.AS and DIA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WIND.ASDIA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.20

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.80

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.75

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.10

+0.56

Drawdowns

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIND.AS drawdown since its inception was -38.13%, smaller than the maximum DIA.AS drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIND.AS and DIA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIND.ASDIA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.13%

-59.02%

+20.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-5.71%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-21.07%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-21.07%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.13%

-36.08%

-2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

0.00%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-11.92%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.62%

+0.95%

Volatility

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) at 2.35%. This indicates that WIND.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIND.ASDIA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

2.35%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

7.88%

+3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

9.05%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

13.49%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

17.04%

+1.69%

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIND.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA.AS's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIND.AS vs. DIA.AS - Dividend Comparison

WIND.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA.AS
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.37%1.47%1.55%1.85%1.93%1.52%2.03%2.10%2.18%2.08%2.16%2.51%
WIND.AS
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIND.AS and DIA.AS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DIA.AS is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DIA.AS is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WIND.AS.

WIND.AS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while DIA.AS is Large Cap Value Equities. WIND.AS tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while DIA.AS tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WIND.AS and 0.16% for DIA.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIND.AS and DIA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer