WIMA vs. XRLX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and XRLX (FundX Conservative ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WIMA is passively managed, while XRLX is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for XRLX.

Performance

WIMA vs. XRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WIMA

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRLX

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 5.49%
• 1Y: 14.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIMA vs. XRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	-0.59%
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between WIMA and XRLX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.76

Return for Risk

WIMA vs. XRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLX

XRLX Risk / Return Rank: 56
XRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
XRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIMA vs. XRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WIMA	XRLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.36	—

Drawdowns

WIMA vs. XRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum XRLX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and XRLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIMA	XRLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-15.33%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-2.36%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-1.70%	+0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WIMA	XRLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	8.85%	+7.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.79%	11.17%	+5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.79%	11.17%	+5.62%

WIMA vs. XRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLX's 1.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIMA vs. XRLX - Dividend Comparison

WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF	2.62%	2.77%	1.66%	1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIMA and XRLX in my portfolio?

WIMA and XRLX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WIMA or XRLX?

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WIMA or XRLX?

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.63% for XRLX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WIMA or XRLX?

XRLX has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.

What is the main difference between WIMA and XRLX?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and FundX. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 1.63% for XRLX.