WIMA vs. GDMN
WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WIMA is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WIMA is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
WIMA vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WIMA
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDMN
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -22.49%
- 6M
- -37.65%
- YTD
- -26.31%
- 1Y
- 41.71%
- 3Y*
- 47.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 8.91% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -44.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between WIMA and GDMN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WIMA vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
WIMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDMN
WIMA vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WIMA | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WIMA vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -4.81%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIMA | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -52.82% | +48.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -51.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -51.62% | +50.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -19.55% | +18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.55% | — |
Volatility
WIMA vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WIMA | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 64.73% | -45.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 48.34% | -28.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 48.34% | -28.89% |
WIMA vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
WIMA vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
WIMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than GDMN's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.67% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WIMA and GDMN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.99% for WIMA.
WIMA is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 0.45% for GDMN.
Find the right allocation for WIMA and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer