WIMA vs. EPI
WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and EPI (WisdomTree India Earnings Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WIMA is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index, while EPI is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree India Earnings Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for EPI.
Performance
WIMA vs. EPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WIMA
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPI
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- -7.84%
- 6M
- -8.06%
- 1Y
- -7.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
WIMA vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | -0.59% |
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund | -1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between WIMA and EPI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WIMA vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank
WIMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EPI
WIMA vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WIMA | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WIMA vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and EPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIMA | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -66.21% | +62.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -15.84% | +13.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -18.64% | +17.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.33% | — |
Volatility
WIMA vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WIMA | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.79% | 15.21% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 16.26% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 20.30% | -3.51% |
WIMA vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
WIMA vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison
Neither WIMA nor EPI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.15% | 6.01% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 1.05% | 1.20% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WIMA and EPI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.
WIMA and EPI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WIMA is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while EPI is Emerging Markets Equities. WIMA tracks WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index, while EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 0.84% for EPI.
Find the right allocation for WIMA and EPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer