WIMA vs. CLSM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds - WIMA tracks the WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index while CLSM tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CLSM.

Performance

WIMA vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WIMA

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSM

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 6M: 19.45%
• 1Y: 33.43%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIMA vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.53%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WIMA and CLSM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

WIMA vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 81
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIMA vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WIMA	CLSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.34	+0.19

Drawdowns

WIMA vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum CLSM drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and CLSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIMA	CLSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-27.77%	+25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-1.06%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-16.48%	+15.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WIMA	CLSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.38%	12.73%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.38%	12.47%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.38%	12.47%	+0.91%

WIMA vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIMA vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison

WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.75%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIMA and CLSM in my portfolio?

WIMA and CLSM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WIMA or CLSM?

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WIMA or CLSM?

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WIMA or CLSM?

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.

What is the main difference between WIMA and CLSM?

WIMA tracks WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index, while CLSM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 0.82% for CLSM.