WILIX vs. WBGSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WILIX (William Blair International Leaders Fund) and WBGSX (William Blair Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WILIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by William Blair, while WBGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair. Over the past 10 years, WILIX returned 9.27%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for WBGSX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WILIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for WBGSX.

Performance

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair International Leaders Fund (WILIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WILIX achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than WBGSX's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WILIX has underperformed WBGSX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while WBGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.

WILIX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 20.27%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 13.74%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

WBGSX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 9.31%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: 25.54%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 10.33%
• 10Y*: 15.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WILIX William Blair International Leaders Fund	16.99%	23.21%	-0.50%	13.10%	-28.55%	10.16%	26.79%	31.76%	-12.43%	30.03%
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund	10.45%	10.69%	21.86%	37.75%	-29.75%	21.71%	36.12%	32.11%	4.88%	24.19%

Correlation

The correlation between WILIX and WBGSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.64

The correlation between WILIX and WBGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WILIX vs. WBGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WILIX

WILIX Risk / Return Rank: 35
WILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
WILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
WILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

WBGSX

WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 24
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair International Leaders Fund (WILIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WILIX	WBGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.61	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.20	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.37	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	3.91	+3.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WILIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the WBGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WILIX and WBGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WILIX	WBGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.61	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.48	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.74	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.51	+0.01

Drawdowns

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WILIX drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum WBGSX drawdown of -53.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WILIX and WBGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WILIX	WBGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.01%	-53.05%	+12.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-19.70%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.21%	-25.45%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.01%	-36.90%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.01%	-36.90%	-4.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.27%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-11.52%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	6.87%	-3.21%

Volatility

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair International Leaders Fund (WILIX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) at 4.53%. This indicates that WILIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WILIX	WBGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	4.53%	+1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.66%	12.64%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.18%	16.75%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.82%	21.50%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	20.54%	-2.81%

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WILIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than WBGSX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

WILIX vs. WBGSX - Dividend Comparison

WILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than WBGSX's 39.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund	39.80%	43.96%	34.53%	12.73%	4.59%	14.82%	15.07%	10.27%	38.86%	38.00%	8.81%	13.92%
WILIX William Blair International Leaders Fund	6.82%	7.98%	0.58%	0.45%	0.19%	2.82%	0.80%	0.56%	4.14%	2.17%	1.01%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WILIX and WBGSX in my portfolio?

WILIX and WBGSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WILIX or WBGSX?

WILIX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to WBGSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WILIX dropped -41.01% vs WBGSX's -53.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.