PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WICGX vs. CHILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WICGX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair China Growth Fund (WICGX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WICGX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CHILX's 5.98% return.


WICGX

1D
-1.22%
1M
-8.59%
6M
-5.39%
YTD
-0.61%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-5.91%

CHILX

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.86%
6M
2.25%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WICGX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WICGX
William Blair China Growth Fund
-0.61%24.24%10.36%-24.29%-26.26%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
5.98%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between WICGX and CHILX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.73

The correlation between WICGX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WICGX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WICGX
WICGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
WICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WICGX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair China Growth Fund (WICGX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WICGXCHILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.19

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.81

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

5.84

-4.43

WICGX vs. CHILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WICGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the CHILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WICGX and CHILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WICGX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WICGX drawdown since its inception was -50.35%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WICGX and CHILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WICGXCHILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.35%

-47.73%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.38%

-11.64%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.54%

-22.21%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.11%

-11.34%

-13.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-20.18%

-11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

3.61%

+2.11%

Volatility

WICGX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair China Growth Fund (WICGX) has a higher volatility of 12.60% compared to BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) at 10.16%. This indicates that WICGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WICGXCHILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.60%

10.16%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.71%

17.04%

+4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

20.70%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.58%

20.76%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.58%

22.11%

+3.47%

WICGX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WICGX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WICGX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison

WICGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than CHILX's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.77%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%
WICGX
William Blair China Growth Fund
0.84%0.84%1.38%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WICGX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WICGX has higher volatility (12.60%) compared to CHILX (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WICGX dropped -50.35% vs CHILX's -47.73%.

CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WICGX and CHILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer