PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIA vs. FIPDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIA vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund (WIA) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIA achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than FIPDX's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, WIA has outperformed FIPDX with an annualized return of 3.70%, while FIPDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.


WIA

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
3.70%
ALL TIME*
2.99%

FIPDX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.44%
6M
0.11%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$300.97K$311.91K$319.88K

WIA vs. FIPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WIA
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund
0.15%11.43%6.08%5.04%-25.85%7.70%19.35%18.98%-6.83%6.41%
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
0.55%6.90%2.00%3.77%-12.09%5.94%10.90%8.32%-1.37%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WIA and FIPDX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.36

The correlation between WIA and FIPDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (10 years) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIA vs. FIPDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WIA
WIA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FIPDX
FIPDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FIPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WIA vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund (WIA) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WIAFIPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.27

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

3.38

-1.69

WIA vs. FIPDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the FIPDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIA and FIPDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WIA vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIA drawdown since its inception was -30.36%, which is greater than FIPDX's maximum drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIA and FIPDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIAFIPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.36%

-14.32%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-1.94%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.13%

-3.95%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.36%

-14.32%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.36%

-14.32%

-16.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.68%

-1.19%

-7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-4.43%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

0.73%

+0.79%

Volatility

WIA vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund (WIA) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) at 0.76%. This indicates that WIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIAFIPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

0.76%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

2.49%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

3.33%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.57%

5.96%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.55%

5.36%

+5.19%

WIA vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIA has a 4.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIA vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison

WIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than FIPDX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
4.36%4.18%3.75%3.56%8.87%4.76%1.24%1.97%2.26%1.29%1.34%0.38%
WIA
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund
7.88%7.50%7.50%11.08%15.23%10.65%5.71%3.41%3.91%3.43%3.34%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIA and FIPDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIA has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to FIPDX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIA dropped -30.36% vs FIPDX's -14.32%.

FIPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIA and FIPDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer