WHR vs. BIL
WHR (Whirlpool Corporation) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, WHR returned -9.69%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BIL. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
WHR vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHR achieves a -35.53% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WHR has underperformed BIL with an annualized return of -9.69%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.
WHR
- 1D
- 13.80%
- 1M
- 20.48%
- 6M
- -45.61%
- YTD
- -35.53%
- 1Y
- -42.76%
- 3Y*
- -27.29%
- 5Y*
- -23.28%
- 10Y*
- -9.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.18%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $968.84M | $901.78M | $924.99M | |
| $104.72M | $99.38M | $121.50M |
WHR vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHR Whirlpool Corporation | -35.53% | -33.03% | 0.60% | -9.09% | -37.16% | 33.26% | 26.52% | 42.83% | -34.50% | -4.89% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.10% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHR and BIL is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHR vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
WHR
BIL
WHR vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -152.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 68.62 | -67.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 345.49 | -346.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 2,450.06 | -2,451.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHR vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHR drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHR and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -0.78% | -81.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.66% | -0.01% | -61.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.14% | -0.01% | -71.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.10% | -0.08% | -81.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.77% | -0.21% | -81.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.56% | 0.00% | -76.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.26% | -0.26% | -23.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.45% | 0.00% | +35.45% |
Volatility
WHR vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) has a higher volatility of 19.01% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that WHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.01% | 0.05% | +18.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.75% | 0.14% | +40.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.72% | 0.20% | +48.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.72% | 0.26% | +40.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.38% | 0.26% | +39.12% |
Dividends
WHR vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
WHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than BIL's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.77% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
WHR Whirlpool Corporation | 8.43% | 7.35% | 6.11% | 5.75% | 4.95% | 2.32% | 2.69% | 3.22% | 4.26% | 2.55% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WHR and BIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHR has higher volatility (19.01%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHR dropped -82.49% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.07 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHR and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer