PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHOSX vs. WGROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHOSX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than WGROX's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WHOSX has underperformed WGROX with an annualized return of -2.81%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


WHOSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
-4.30%
5Y*
-8.62%
10Y*
-2.81%

WGROX

1D
-1.32%
1M
1.89%
YTD
2.95%
6M
0.29%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
0.28%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHOSX
Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund
-1.05%2.34%-10.95%1.39%-34.13%-4.94%20.05%17.15%-3.84%10.46%
WGROX
Wasatch Core Growth Fund
2.95%-10.37%13.13%33.43%-30.86%20.76%36.73%33.31%-3.75%24.29%

Correlation

The correlation between WHOSX and WGROX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 1986

-0.12

The correlation between WHOSX and WGROX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHOSX vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHOSX
WHOSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
WHOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
WHOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

WGROX
WGROX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
WGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
WGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHOSXWGROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.01

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

-0.06

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

-0.14

+0.57

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the WGROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHOSX and WGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHOSX drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, smaller than the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHOSX and WGROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHOSXWGROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.95%

-61.61%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-15.89%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.73%

-27.61%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-40.16%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.95%

-40.16%

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.28%

-16.48%

-32.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-9.90%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

6.41%

-1.83%

Volatility

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) is 0.18%, while Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that WHOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHOSXWGROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

5.66%

-5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

14.48%

-8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

19.51%

-8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

23.07%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

23.33%

-6.13%

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHOSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHOSX vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison

WHOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than WGROX's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WGROX
Wasatch Core Growth Fund
8.31%8.55%9.22%0.00%0.71%16.82%7.21%10.73%10.14%6.24%0.15%12.70%
WHOSX
Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund
4.11%4.05%3.80%2.90%2.45%1.31%7.99%1.83%2.22%1.96%10.89%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHOSX and WGROX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGROX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to WHOSX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHOSX dropped -53.95% vs WGROX's -61.61%.

WHOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHOSX and WGROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer