WHGSX vs. FSSAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WHGSX (Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund) and FSSAX (Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WHGSX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Westwood, while FSSAX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, WHGSX returned 8.75%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FSSAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WHGSX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FSSAX.

Performance

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WHGSX having a 9.42% return and FSSAX slightly higher at 9.64%. Over the past 10 years, WHGSX has underperformed FSSAX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while FSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.

WHGSX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 9.42%
• 6M: 7.28%
• 1Y: 15.21%
• 3Y*: 9.16%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 8.75%

FSSAX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 6M: 9.93%
• 1Y: 25.26%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund	9.42%	-0.12%	4.75%	17.16%	-12.42%	27.94%	2.16%	27.13%	-14.25%	12.38%
FSSAX Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund	9.64%	7.88%	13.02%	31.05%	-30.29%	-0.24%	41.68%	42.14%	-3.08%	21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGSX and FSSAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2007	0.87

The correlation between WHGSX and FSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WHGSX vs. FSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGSX

WHGSX Risk / Return Rank: 16
WHGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WHGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
WHGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
WHGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
WHGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FSSAX

FSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WHGSX	FSSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.46	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.11	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.27	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	8.65	-4.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the FSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGSX and FSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WHGSX	FSSAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.46	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.12	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.51	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.35	-0.05

Drawdowns

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGSX drawdown since its inception was -56.51%, smaller than the maximum FSSAX drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGSX and FSSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WHGSX	FSSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.51%	-59.61%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-11.99%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.67%	-29.48%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.67%	-42.58%	+15.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.94%	-42.80%	-0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-0.27%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-14.74%	+4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	3.14%	+0.77%

Volatility

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX) have volatilities of 4.95% and 4.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WHGSX	FSSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	4.72%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	13.64%	-1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.42%	18.59%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	24.34%	-4.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.09%	23.95%	-1.86%

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSAX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

WHGSX vs. FSSAX - Dividend Comparison

WHGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than FSSAX's 6.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSSAX Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund	6.97%	7.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.54%	16.49%	9.31%	12.17%	22.72%	1.77%	0.00%	1.92%
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund	5.58%	6.11%	6.37%	4.06%	3.67%	4.69%	0.65%	1.04%	7.20%	7.25%	0.52%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WHGSX and FSSAX in my portfolio?

WHGSX and FSSAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WHGSX or FSSAX?

WHGSX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to FSSAX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGSX dropped -56.51% vs FSSAX's -59.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.