WHGLX vs. GQEFX
WHGLX (Westwood Quality Value Fund) and GQEFX (GMO Quality Fund Class IV) are both Quality Factor funds. Over the past 5 years, WHGLX returned 7.13%/yr vs 12.55%/yr for GQEFX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WHGLX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for GQEFX.
Performance
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than GQEFX's 6.55% return.
WHGLX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 12.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.19%
GQEFX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGLX Westwood Quality Value Fund | 8.97% | 5.73% | 10.52% | 8.91% | -5.64% | 23.73% | 2.71% | 27.34% | -6.18% | 12.07% |
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV | 6.55% | 19.64% | 17.54% | 28.95% | -15.30% | 31.76% | 18.39% | 31.87% | 0.54% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHGLX and GQEFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between WHGLX and GQEFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHGLX vs. GQEFX — Risk / Return Rank
WHGLX
GQEFX
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHGLX | GQEFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 5.97 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than GQEFX's maximum drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and GQEFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHGLX | GQEFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -30.42% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -12.74% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -15.55% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | -24.22% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.36% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -4.11% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.22% | -1.40% |
Volatility
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) is 2.67%, while GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that WHGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHGLX | GQEFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 3.14% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 10.16% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 12.80% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 15.94% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 17.69% | -1.49% |
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GQEFX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
WHGLX vs. GQEFX - Dividend Comparison
WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, more than GQEFX's 11.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV | 11.25% | 11.15% | 3.70% | 3.43% | 11.84% | 10.23% | 13.62% | 8.09% | 21.69% | 7.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WHGLX Westwood Quality Value Fund | 20.11% | 21.91% | 7.64% | 3.78% | 1.52% | 17.70% | 5.86% | 4.63% | 12.36% | 6.53% | 4.04% | 10.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WHGLX and GQEFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GQEFX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to WHGLX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGLX dropped -51.00% vs GQEFX's -30.42%.
GQEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHGLX and GQEFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer