PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGLX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than FBLEX's 10.21% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGLX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 9.81%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


WHGLX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
5.55%
6M
4.89%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
9.81%

FBLEX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.97%
YTD
10.21%
6M
9.61%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
5.55%5.73%10.52%8.91%-5.64%23.73%2.71%27.34%-6.18%20.86%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.21%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGLX and FBLEX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.94

The correlation between WHGLX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGLX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGLX
WHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHGLXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.41

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.63

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

14.62

-8.46

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGLX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGLXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-39.73%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-6.89%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-14.71%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-19.00%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-39.73%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.77%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-3.81%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.70%

+0.13%

Volatility

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) have volatilities of 3.29% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGLXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.35%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

8.21%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

10.83%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

14.79%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

17.41%

-1.15%

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGLX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.76%, more than FBLEX's 10.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.08%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
20.76%21.91%7.64%3.78%1.52%17.70%5.86%4.63%12.36%6.53%4.04%10.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WHGLX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBLEX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to WHGLX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGLX dropped -51.00% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGLX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer