PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGHX vs. PRCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGHX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than PRCPX's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGHX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 6.23%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.


WHGHX

1D
0.29%
1M
2.27%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.67%
1Y
13.52%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
6.23%

PRCPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.79%
6M
3.27%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGHX
Westwood High Income Fund
4.46%9.60%9.73%11.53%-11.10%7.24%14.89%9.45%0.36%4.20%
PRCPX
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund
1.79%11.51%9.36%14.90%-10.50%6.36%5.55%13.77%-1.44%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGHX and PRCPX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.63

The correlation between WHGHX and PRCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGHX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGHX
WHGHX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
WHGHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCPX
PRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGHXPRCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.78

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

5.10

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.96

24.42

-6.46

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the PRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGHX and PRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGHXPRCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

3.08

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.19

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

1.21

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Drawdowns

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGHX drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum PRCPX drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGHX and PRCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGHXPRCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-23.07%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-1.99%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.76%

-3.83%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.88%

-14.34%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.11%

-23.07%

+4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-3.12%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.41%

+0.36%

Volatility

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 0.90%. This indicates that WHGHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGHXPRCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.90%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

2.39%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

3.29%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

4.81%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

5.45%

+0.49%

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGHX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGHX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison

WHGHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than PRCPX's 9.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRCPX
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund
9.27%9.32%8.77%7.88%4.89%5.11%5.36%5.18%5.72%4.95%5.88%7.58%
WHGHX
Westwood High Income Fund
5.58%6.27%5.81%5.23%4.79%3.45%3.54%4.39%4.79%4.58%4.07%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGHX and PRCPX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WHGHX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to PRCPX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGHX dropped -18.11% vs PRCPX's -23.07%.

WHGHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGHX and PRCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer