PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGHX vs. WHGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) and Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGHX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than WHGSX's 8.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGHX has underperformed WHGSX with an annualized return of 6.20%, while WHGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.64% annualized return.


WHGHX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.58%
YTD
4.16%
6M
4.68%
1Y
13.54%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
6.20%

WHGSX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
8.32%
6M
7.82%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGHX
Westwood High Income Fund
4.16%9.60%9.73%11.53%-11.10%7.24%14.89%9.45%0.36%4.20%
WHGSX
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund
8.32%-0.12%4.75%17.16%-12.42%27.94%2.16%27.13%-14.25%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGHX and WHGSX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2011

0.52

The correlation between WHGHX and WHGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGHX vs. WHGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGHX
WHGHX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WHGHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WHGSX
WHGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
WHGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) and Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGHXWHGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

0.92

+2.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.63

1.49

+3.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.17

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.53

+2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.54

4.10

+13.44

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the WHGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGHX and WHGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGHXWHGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

0.92

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.17

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.39

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.29

+0.71

Drawdowns

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGHX drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum WHGSX drawdown of -56.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGHX and WHGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGHXWHGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-56.51%

+38.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-10.47%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.76%

-26.67%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.88%

-26.67%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.11%

-42.94%

+24.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.81%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-10.46%

+8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.91%

-3.14%

Volatility

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) is 1.49%, while Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that WHGHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGHXWHGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

4.86%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

11.94%

-8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

17.43%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

20.14%

-13.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

22.09%

-16.15%

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGHX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than WHGSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGHX vs. WHGSX - Dividend Comparison

WHGHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, which matches WHGSX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WHGHX
Westwood High Income Fund
5.60%6.27%5.81%5.23%4.79%3.45%3.54%4.39%4.79%4.58%4.07%4.60%
WHGSX
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund
5.64%6.11%6.37%4.06%3.67%4.69%0.65%1.04%7.20%7.25%0.52%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGHX and WHGSX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WHGSX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to WHGHX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGHX dropped -18.11% vs WHGSX's -56.51%.

WHGHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGHX and WHGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer