PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WHF vs. TSLX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


WHFTSLX
YTD Return-3.61%3.85%
1Y Return0.47%10.21%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.22%5.42%
5Y Return (Ann)6.63%11.62%
10Y Return (Ann)10.83%13.00%
Sharpe Ratio0.050.82
Sortino Ratio0.191.19
Omega Ratio1.021.15
Calmar Ratio0.071.30
Martin Ratio0.213.87
Ulcer Index4.68%2.90%
Daily Std Dev17.60%13.73%
Max Drawdown-57.48%-50.27%
Current Drawdown-13.22%-4.45%

Fundamentals


WHFTSLX
Market Cap$246.14M$1.90B
EPS$0.45$2.06
PE Ratio23.539.89
PEG Ratio1.011.27
Total Revenue (TTM)$79.68M$117.07B
Gross Profit (TTM)$85.70M$232.49B
EBITDA (TTM)$46.68M$109.00B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between WHF and TSLX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

WHF vs. TSLX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WHF achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than TSLX's 3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, WHF has underperformed TSLX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while TSLX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.95%
-1.24%
WHF
TSLX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WHF vs. TSLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WHF, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.21
TSLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TSLX, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TSLX, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TSLX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TSLX, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TSLX, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.87

WHF vs. TSLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the TSLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHF and TSLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.05
0.82
WHF
TSLX

Dividends

WHF vs. TSLX - Dividend Comparison

WHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.86%, more than TSLX's 12.61% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
16.86%12.60%11.26%10.03%11.35%11.79%11.16%13.23%11.67%12.37%12.29%9.40%
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
12.61%9.72%10.34%15.35%11.08%8.43%9.84%10.81%8.35%9.62%9.10%0.00%

Drawdowns

WHF vs. TSLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHF drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, which is greater than TSLX's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHF and TSLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.22%
-4.45%
WHF
TSLX

Volatility

WHF vs. TSLX - Volatility Comparison

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) at 4.51%. This indicates that WHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.14%
4.51%
WHF
TSLX

Financials

WHF vs. TSLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items