PortfoliosLab logo
WHF vs. ARCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WHF and ARCC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WHF vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WHF:

-0.87

ARCC:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

WHF:

-1.13

ARCC:

1.01

Omega Ratio

WHF:

0.86

ARCC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

WHF:

-0.79

ARCC:

0.71

Martin Ratio

WHF:

-1.62

ARCC:

2.70

Ulcer Index

WHF:

11.33%

ARCC:

4.91%

Daily Std Dev

WHF:

20.97%

ARCC:

20.83%

Max Drawdown

WHF:

-57.48%

ARCC:

-79.40%

Current Drawdown

WHF:

-20.61%

ARCC:

-5.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WHF:

$208.96M

ARCC:

$15.25B

EPS

WHF:

$0.39

ARCC:

$2.04

PE Ratio

WHF:

23.03

ARCC:

10.77

PEG Ratio

WHF:

1.01

ARCC:

3.95

PS Ratio

WHF:

2.43

ARCC:

5.05

PB Ratio

WHF:

0.74

ARCC:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

WHF:

$70.56M

ARCC:

$2.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WHF:

$46.20M

ARCC:

$2.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

WHF:

$24.66M

ARCC:

$1.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHF achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, WHF has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 8.65%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


WHF

YTD

-3.61%

1M

-6.36%

6M

-7.82%

1Y

-18.14%

3Y*

-1.90%

5Y*

8.58%

10Y*

8.65%

ARCC

YTD

2.66%

1M

5.62%

6M

3.95%

1Y

11.55%

3Y*

14.62%

5Y*

17.79%

10Y*

13.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.

Ares Capital Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WHF vs. ARCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WHF is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WHF is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WHF is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WHF is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WHF is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WHF is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARCC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARCC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARCC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WHF vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WHF Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHF and ARCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

WHF vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

WHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.88%, more than ARCC's 8.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
19.88%18.44%12.60%11.26%10.03%11.35%11.79%11.16%13.23%11.67%12.37%12.29%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
8.74%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%10.06%

Drawdowns

WHF vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHF drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHF and ARCC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

WHF vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 4.85%. This indicates that WHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WHF vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
18.80M
599.00M
(WHF) Total Revenue
(ARCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items