PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WHF vs. HTGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


WHFHTGC
YTD Return-3.61%26.58%
1Y Return0.47%35.61%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.22%16.49%
5Y Return (Ann)6.63%18.78%
10Y Return (Ann)10.83%13.32%
Sharpe Ratio0.051.64
Sortino Ratio0.191.96
Omega Ratio1.021.34
Calmar Ratio0.071.95
Martin Ratio0.216.53
Ulcer Index4.68%5.45%
Daily Std Dev17.60%21.72%
Max Drawdown-57.48%-68.29%
Current Drawdown-13.22%-6.62%

Fundamentals


WHFHTGC
Market Cap$246.14M$3.22B
EPS$0.45$2.04
PE Ratio23.539.71
PEG Ratio1.010.52
Total Revenue (TTM)$79.68M$507.35M
Gross Profit (TTM)$85.70M$452.75M
EBITDA (TTM)$46.68M-$39.64M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between WHF and HTGC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

WHF vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WHF achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's 26.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WHF has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 10.83%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.95%
4.79%
WHF
HTGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WHF vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WHF, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WHF, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.10
HTGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.95
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 6.53, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.53

WHF vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHF and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.03
1.64
WHF
HTGC

Dividends

WHF vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

WHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.86%, more than HTGC's 10.51% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
16.86%12.60%11.26%10.03%11.35%11.79%11.16%13.23%11.67%12.37%12.29%9.40%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
10.51%11.40%14.90%9.34%9.57%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%8.33%6.77%

Drawdowns

WHF vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHF drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHF and HTGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.22%
-6.62%
WHF
HTGC

Volatility

WHF vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 5.58%. This indicates that WHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.96%
5.58%
WHF
HTGC

Financials

WHF vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items