WHF vs. SLRC
WHF (WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.) and SLRC (SLR Investment Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, WHF returned 7.98%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for SLRC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WHF vs. SLRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHF achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than SLRC's -16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WHF has outperformed SLRC with an annualized return of 7.98%, while SLRC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.06% annualized return.
WHF
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- -11.96%
- 3Y*
- -6.52%
- 5Y*
- -3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
SLRC
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -16.34%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -15.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
WHF vs. SLRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 1.11% | -15.36% | -8.52% | 6.26% | -6.23% | 25.77% | 19.14% | 20.83% | 4.80% | 21.87% |
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | -16.34% | 5.72% | 19.15% | 20.57% | -16.13% | 14.74% | -5.63% | 16.18% | 2.78% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHF and SLRC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
WHF:
$0.69
SLRC:
$1.77
WHF:
9.52
SLRC:
6.91
WHF:
3.15
SLRC:
2.60
WHF:
$47.81M
SLRC:
$192.87M
WHF:
$14.33M
SLRC:
$139.32M
WHF:
-$4.37M
SLRC:
$143.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHF vs. SLRC — Risk / Return Rank
WHF
SLRC
WHF vs. SLRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.89 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.72 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | -1.84 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHF vs. SLRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHF drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, smaller than the maximum SLRC drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHF and SLRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.48% | -63.06% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -22.12% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.91% | -22.12% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -31.72% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.48% | -63.06% | +5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.51% | -22.12% | -7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -7.51% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.53% | 8.64% | +5.89% |
Volatility
WHF vs. SLRC - Volatility Comparison
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) at 5.85%. This indicates that WHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 5.85% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.68% | 20.84% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.23% | 23.34% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 20.34% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 29.52% | +2.05% |
Dividends
WHF vs. SLRC - Dividend Comparison
WHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.02%, more than SLRC's 12.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 12.56% | 10.61% | 10.15% | 10.91% | 11.79% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 18.02% | 20.72% | 18.44% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 13.96% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 10.58% | 11.67% | 12.37% |
Financials
WHF vs. SLRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and SLR Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WHF vs. SLRC - Profitability Comparison
WHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 15.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SLR Investment Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 49.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 15.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SLRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SLR Investment Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 49.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
WHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 5.73M and revenue of 15.86M, resulting in a net margin of 36.1%.
SLRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SLR Investment Corp. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 49.29M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WHF and SLRC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHF has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to SLRC (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHF dropped -57.48% vs SLRC's -63.06%.
WHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHF and SLRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer