WHF vs. SLRC
Compare and contrast key facts about WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WHF or SLRC.
Correlation
The correlation between WHF and SLRC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WHF vs. SLRC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WHF:
-0.38
SLRC:
1.30
WHF:
-0.42
SLRC:
1.93
WHF:
0.95
SLRC:
1.24
WHF:
-0.43
SLRC:
1.77
WHF:
-1.03
SLRC:
5.85
WHF:
6.40%
SLRC:
3.03%
WHF:
17.25%
SLRC:
13.60%
WHF:
-57.48%
SLRC:
-63.06%
WHF:
-15.51%
SLRC:
-2.43%
Fundamentals
WHF:
$246.61M
SLRC:
$873.96M
WHF:
$0.45
SLRC:
$1.77
WHF:
23.58
SLRC:
9.05
WHF:
1.01
SLRC:
2.65
WHF:
$79.68M
SLRC:
$238.66M
WHF:
$85.70M
SLRC:
$192.99M
WHF:
$23.39M
SLRC:
$189.18M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHF achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than SLRC's 18.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WHF has outperformed SLRC with an annualized return of 10.95%, while SLRC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.37% annualized return.
WHF
-6.16%
-1.71%
-11.74%
-5.39%
6.80%
10.95%
SLRC
18.34%
0.81%
6.60%
17.17%
5.15%
8.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WHF vs. SLRC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WHF vs. SLRC - Dividend Comparison
WHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.98%, more than SLRC's 10.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 17.98% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 11.35% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 13.23% | 11.67% | 12.37% | 12.29% | 9.40% |
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 10.22% | 10.93% | 11.81% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% | 8.88% | 8.87% |
Drawdowns
WHF vs. SLRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHF drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, smaller than the maximum SLRC drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHF and SLRC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WHF vs. SLRC - Volatility Comparison
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) at 3.60%. This indicates that WHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WHF vs. SLRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and SLR Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities