WHF vs. SLRC
Compare and contrast key facts about WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC).
Performance
WHF vs. SLRC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WHF vs. SLRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 6.62% | -15.36% | -8.52% | 6.26% | -6.23% | 25.77% | 19.14% | 20.83% | 4.80% | 21.87% |
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | -4.69% | 5.72% | 19.15% | 20.57% | -16.13% | 14.74% | -5.63% | 16.18% | 2.78% | 4.72% |
Fundamentals
WHF:
$1.15
SLRC:
$1.65
WHF:
6.42
SLRC:
8.67
WHF:
3.94
SLRC:
4.66
WHF:
$43.62M
SLRC:
$167.35M
WHF:
$19.82M
SLRC:
$99.90M
WHF:
$0.00
SLRC:
$90.07M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHF achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly higher than SLRC's -4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, WHF has outperformed SLRC with an annualized return of 9.36%, while SLRC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.71% annualized return.
WHF
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 17.62%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- -12.87%
- 3Y*
- -4.03%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
SLRC
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- -4.69%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- -5.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHF vs. SLRC — Risk / Return Rank
WHF
SLRC
WHF vs. SLRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) and SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | -0.26 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | -0.22 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.46 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | -1.19 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | -0.26 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.30 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.32 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between WHF and SLRC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WHF vs. SLRC - Dividend Comparison
WHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.39%, more than SLRC's 11.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 14.39% | 20.72% | 18.44% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 13.96% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 10.58% | 11.67% | 12.37% |
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 11.46% | 10.61% | 10.15% | 10.91% | 11.79% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% |
Drawdowns
WHF vs. SLRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHF drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, smaller than the maximum SLRC drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHF and SLRC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.48% | -63.06% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.62% | -16.13% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -31.72% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.48% | -63.06% | +5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.67% | -8.63% | -17.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -7.44% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.85% | 6.18% | +9.67% |
Volatility
WHF vs. SLRC - Volatility Comparison
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) at 6.63%. This indicates that WHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WHF | SLRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 6.63% | +3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.45% | 14.92% | +7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.84% | 22.03% | +5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 19.30% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.47% | 29.13% | +2.34% |
Financials
WHF vs. SLRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and SLR Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities