WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS
WHCS.AS (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WHCS.AS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WHCS.AS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.
Performance
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WHCS.AS
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- -3.10%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WHCS.AS iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc | -3.10% | 15.82% | -8.65% |
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHCS.AS and DFND.AS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank
WHCS.AS
DFND.AS
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHCS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHCS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHCS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.71% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHCS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | — | — |
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHCS.AS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WHCS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison
WHCS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while DFND.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WHCS.AS iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc | 1.08% | 1.05% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.08% | 1.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WHCS.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WHCS.AS.
WHCS.AS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. WHCS.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for WHCS.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.
Find the right allocation for WHCS.AS and DFND.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer