WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE
WH2E.DE (Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WH2E.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care while CBUF.DE tracks the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WH2E.DE returned 3.13%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CBUF.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WH2E.DE achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than CBUF.DE's -2.22% return.
WH2E.DE
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -2.41%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WH2E.DE Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -3.24% | 2.78% | 7.94% | 1.68% |
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WH2E.DE
CBUF.DE
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WH2E.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.10 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.68 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 1.56 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WH2E.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.53 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.44 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WH2E.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum CBUF.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WH2E.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -25.94% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -10.87% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -21.76% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -9.66% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -5.65% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 4.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) have volatilities of 5.21% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WH2E.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 4.98% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 9.70% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 13.98% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 13.60% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 15.36% | -1.45% |
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WH2E.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison
WH2E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
WH2E.DE Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
WH2E.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care, while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
Find the right allocation for WH2E.DE and CBUF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer