WGROX vs. MASKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX).
WGROX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Dec 8, 1986. MASKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 9, 1997.
Performance
WGROX vs. MASKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WGROX vs. MASKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | -8.56% | -10.37% | 13.13% | 33.43% | -30.86% | 20.76% | 36.73% | 33.31% | -3.75% | 24.29% |
MASKX iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund | -2.51% | 12.76% | 11.35% | 16.99% | -20.39% | 14.54% | 19.99% | 25.54% | -11.03% | 14.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGROX achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than MASKX's -2.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WGROX having a 9.85% annualized return and MASKX not far behind at 9.43%.
WGROX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -8.56%
- 6M
- -11.35%
- 1Y
- -9.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
MASKX
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WGROX vs. MASKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WGROX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MASKX's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WGROX vs. MASKX — Risk / Return Rank
WGROX
MASKX
WGROX vs. MASKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGROX | MASKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | 0.91 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | 1.40 | -1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 1.32 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.99 | 5.00 | -6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGROX | MASKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 0.91 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.13 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.34 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between WGROX and MASKX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WGROX vs. MASKX - Dividend Comparison
WGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than MASKX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 9.35% | 8.55% | 9.22% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 16.82% | 7.21% | 10.73% | 10.14% | 6.24% | 0.15% | 12.70% |
MASKX iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.13% | 4.81% | 2.92% | 1.70% | 7.64% | 1.42% | 3.43% | 4.26% | 3.15% | 4.60% | 3.63% |
Drawdowns
WGROX vs. MASKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGROX drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, roughly equal to the maximum MASKX drawdown of -59.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGROX and MASKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGROX | MASKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -59.06% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -13.89% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.16% | -31.98% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.16% | -41.68% | +1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.82% | -11.01% | -14.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -11.69% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 3.68% | +2.05% |
Volatility
WGROX vs. MASKX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WGROX | MASKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 6.63% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 14.09% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 23.10% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 23.14% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 23.63% | -0.40% |