WGMI vs. BTRN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. WGMI is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, WGMI returned 261.44% vs -17.28% for BTRN. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.

Performance

WGMI vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 81.24% return, which is significantly higher than BTRN's -9.20% return.

WGMI

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 25.79%
• YTD: 81.24%
• 6M: 46.67%
• 1Y: 261.44%
• 3Y*: 88.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTRN

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -13.54%
• YTD: -9.20%
• 6M: -9.80%
• 1Y: -17.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGMI vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	81.24%	72.47%	24.71%
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-9.20%	4.89%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WGMI and BTRN is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024	0.50

The correlation between WGMI and BTRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WGMI vs. BTRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WGMI	BTRN
Financial Services	51.3%	68.6%
Technology	45.9%	-
Communication Services	1.2%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Industrials	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

WGMI vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGMI vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGMI	BTRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.48	-0.88	+4.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	-1.15	+4.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.85	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	-0.69	+5.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.48	-1.17	+11.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGMI vs. BTRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the BTRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGMI and BTRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGMI	BTRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48	-0.88	+4.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.00	+0.30

Drawdowns

WGMI vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and BTRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGMI	BTRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-36.97%	-48.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.94%	-25.29%	-25.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-25.22%	+22.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.86%	-14.43%	-28.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.08%	14.76%	+10.32%

Volatility

WGMI vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.93%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGMI	BTRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.90%	6.93%	+11.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.08%	10.35%	+44.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.99%	19.84%	+56.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.50%	30.94%	+50.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.50%	30.94%	+50.56%

WGMI vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGMI vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison

WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	30.57%	27.76%	2.56%	0.00%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGMI and BTRN in my portfolio?

WGMI and BTRN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGMI or BTRN?

WGMI has higher volatility (18.90%) compared to BTRN (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs BTRN's -36.97%.

Which ETF is better, WGMI or BTRN?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 261.44% vs -17.28% for BTRN. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WGMI or BTRN?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 261.44% return vs -17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WGMI or BTRN?

WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WGMI or BTRN?

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.57%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between WGMI and BTRN?

They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.95% for BTRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.