WGFIX vs. NALFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WGFIX (William Blair Global Leaders Fund) and NALFX (New Alternatives Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WGFIX returned 11.80%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for NALFX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WGFIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for NALFX.

Performance

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGFIX achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than NALFX's 18.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WGFIX having a 11.80% annualized return and NALFX not far behind at 11.22%.

WGFIX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.30%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 6M: 9.64%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 13.27%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

NALFX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 18.42%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: 11.60%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	9.97%	16.06%	7.52%	23.02%	-29.32%	16.71%	32.06%	31.97%	-8.04%	30.67%
NALFX New Alternatives Fund	18.71%	28.13%	-6.03%	-2.49%	-15.87%	-4.78%	61.74%	36.98%	-6.91%	21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between WGFIX and NALFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2007	0.71

The correlation between WGFIX and NALFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WGFIX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGFIX

WGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 30
WGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
WGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
WGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
WGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

NALFX

NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 63
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGFIX	NALFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.07	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.79	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	4.17	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	12.18	-5.48

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGFIX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGFIX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, roughly equal to the maximum NALFX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGFIX and NALFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGFIX	NALFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.51%	-59.67%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-7.53%	-5.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-24.35%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.76%	-38.03%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.76%	-42.35%	+3.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.45%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.84%	-14.82%	+2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	2.57%	+0.78%

Volatility

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) at 4.82%. This indicates that WGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGFIX	NALFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	4.82%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	12.41%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.83%	15.15%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.88%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	18.04%	+0.91%

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGFIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGFIX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

WGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 77.78%, more than NALFX's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NALFX New Alternatives Fund	0.98%	1.17%	2.04%	4.47%	4.63%	5.14%	4.93%	5.55%	6.62%	4.16%	3.71%	1.71%
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	77.78%	85.53%	54.25%	6.65%	2.17%	5.65%	12.57%	1.35%	17.62%	4.24%	0.72%	5.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGFIX and NALFX in my portfolio?

WGFIX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGFIX or NALFX?

WGFIX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to NALFX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGFIX dropped -59.51% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.