WGFIX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WGFIX (William Blair Global Leaders Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WGFIX returned 11.19%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for CSUAX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WGFIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGFIX achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, WGFIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 11.19%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.

WGFIX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 11.19%

CSUAX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	8.46%	16.06%	7.52%	23.02%	-29.32%	16.71%	32.06%	31.97%	-8.04%	30.67%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	9.47%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	16.24%	-1.65%	24.26%	-5.83%	17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between WGFIX and CSUAX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2007	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between WGFIX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WGFIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGFIX

WGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 25
WGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
WGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
WGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 40
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGFIX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.70	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.47	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	2.75	-1.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	9.19	-3.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGFIX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGFIX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.70	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.52	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.50	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.55	-0.20

Drawdowns

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGFIX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGFIX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGFIX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.51%	-52.20%	-7.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-5.99%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-14.95%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.76%	-20.45%	-18.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.76%	-35.05%	-3.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-3.39%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-8.44%	-3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	1.79%	+1.49%

Volatility

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.14%. This indicates that WGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGFIX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	3.14%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	7.82%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	9.68%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	12.99%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.86%	14.92%	+3.94%

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGFIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGFIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

WGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.86%, more than CSUAX's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.39%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	78.86%	85.53%	54.25%	6.65%	2.17%	5.65%	12.57%	1.35%	17.62%	4.24%	0.72%	5.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGFIX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

WGFIX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGFIX or CSUAX?

WGFIX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to CSUAX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGFIX dropped -59.51% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.