WGCFX vs. FYMIX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX).

WGCFX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2004. FYMIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 9, 2022.

Performance

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WGCFX Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund	2.47%	14.99%	10.56%	13.82%	-13.99%
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund	-2.11%	18.95%	11.09%	16.15%	-15.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGCFX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than FYMIX's -2.11% return.

WGCFX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 18.20%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: —

FYMIX

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -2.11%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGCFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.

WGCFX

Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund

FYMIX

Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund

Return for Risk

WGCFX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGCFX

WGCFX Risk / Return Rank: 86
WGCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WGCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WGCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
WGCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WGCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FYMIX

FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGCFX	FYMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.33	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.91	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.28	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	1.96	+1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	7.99	+2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGCFX and FYMIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGCFX	FYMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.33	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.47	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between WGCFX and FYMIX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

WGCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than FYMIX's 3.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WGCFX Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund	7.97%	8.17%	6.22%	0.26%	6.87%	13.28%	11.04%	0.60%	18.34%	13.76%
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund	3.77%	3.69%	1.84%	1.78%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGCFX drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FYMIX drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGCFX and FYMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGCFX	FYMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.60%	-22.70%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-8.95%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-6.54%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-5.83%	+0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	2.20%	-0.43%

Volatility

WGCFX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) is 3.25%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that WGCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGCFX	FYMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	5.52%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.54%	8.39%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	13.38%	-2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.66%	12.72%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.46%	12.72%	-1.26%